From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shamburger v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
No. 2:12CV00202 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12CV00202 JLH-HDY

12-07-2012

BOBBY F. SHAMBURGER REG #46114-008 PETITIONER v. JOHN B. FOX, Warden, FCI-Forrest City RESPONDENT


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

1. Petitioner's petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), and failure to respond to the Court's order.

2. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.

________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Shamburger v. Fox

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 7, 2012
No. 2:12CV00202 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Shamburger v. Fox

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY F. SHAMBURGER REG #46114-008 PETITIONER v. JOHN B. FOX, Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 7, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12CV00202 JLH-HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 7, 2012)