From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shakur v. Milusnic

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 17, 2022
5:19-cv-00727-SVW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2022)

Opinion

5:19-cv-00727-SVW(GJS)

02-17-2022

MUTULU SHAKUR, Petitioner v. LOUIS MILUSNIC, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

STEPHEN V. WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to the Court's Order Aeeepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED THAT, habeas relief having been granted: the Bureau of Prisons shall expunge Petitioner's March 2013 disciplinary conviction for a violation of Bureau of Prisons Rule 297; Petitioner shall be provided with a new initial 18 U.S.C. § 4206(d) mandatory parole hearing and consideration within 90 days of the entry of this Judgment; the United States Parole Commission shall assess whether the two Section 4206(d) statutory exceptions to mandatory parole exist without regard to or consideration of the 2013 disciplinary conviction; to the extent that the 2013 disciplinary conviction has been used as a basis for increasing Petitioner's statutory release date under the United States Parole Commission's guidelines, any additional time so imposed shall be removed; and this case is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Shakur v. Milusnic

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 17, 2022
5:19-cv-00727-SVW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Shakur v. Milusnic

Case Details

Full title:MUTULU SHAKUR, Petitioner v. LOUIS MILUSNIC, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 17, 2022

Citations

5:19-cv-00727-SVW(GJS) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2022)