From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shahrivar v. Sykes

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 29, 2023
10-cv-01029-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2023)

Opinion

10-cv-01029-RS

06-29-2023

FARID SHAHRIVAR, Plaintiff, v. DAVID SYKES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RESETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

RICHARD SEEBORG Chief United States District Judge

Nearly a week after it was due, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not seek either an extension or leave to file a late opposition, and did not even acknowledge the filing was late. Although the conduct of plaintiff's counsel cannot be condoned, the interest in resolving motions on the merits warrants allowing plaintiff's opposition to be considered. To prevent prejudice to defendants, their deadline to file a reply brief is extended to July 13, 2023, and the hearing is continued to July 20, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Shahrivar v. Sykes

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 29, 2023
10-cv-01029-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Shahrivar v. Sykes

Case Details

Full title:FARID SHAHRIVAR, Plaintiff, v. DAVID SYKES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 29, 2023

Citations

10-cv-01029-RS (N.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2023)