From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SHAH v. STATE

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 11, 2011
16 A.3d 938 (Del. 2011)

Summary

affirming the Superior Court's denial of Shah's sixth petition for postconviction relief

Summary of this case from SHAH v. STATE

Opinion

No. 665, 2010.

Submitted: February 25, 2011.

Decided: April 11, 2011.

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County, Cr. ID 0002019769.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.


ORDER


This 11th day of April 2011, upon consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's October 7, 2010 decision. The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant's sixth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as untimely, repetitive, and previously adjudicated and that appellant had failed to overcome these procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

SHAH v. STATE

Supreme Court of Delaware
Apr 11, 2011
16 A.3d 938 (Del. 2011)

affirming the Superior Court's denial of Shah's sixth petition for postconviction relief

Summary of this case from SHAH v. STATE
Case details for

SHAH v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:KUSHAL SHAH a/k/a GERRON LINDSEY, Defendant Below-Appellant, v. STATE OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Apr 11, 2011

Citations

16 A.3d 938 (Del. 2011)

Citing Cases

SHAH v. STATE

The Superior Court denied Shah's motion for correction of sentence on the ground that the issue already had…