From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Shah v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2023
2:22-cv-01830-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01830-AC

06-22-2023

PARIMAL K. SHAH, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. v.

PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration KRYSTLE S. MCMULLAN, DCBN 242319 Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant KRYSTLE S. MCMULLAN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE, WSBN 32245 Associate General Counsel Office of Program Litigation, Office 7 Social Security Administration KRYSTLE S. MCMULLAN, DCBN 242319 Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

KRYSTLE S. MCMULLAN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant, Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”), by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby moves for leave to amend the Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Defendant's brief) to conform with this Court's 20-page limit as set forth in your honor's standing orders.

When the Commissioner filed her brief on June 16, 2023 (Dkt. 21), she inadvertently followed the local rule that specifies no page limit, instead of this Court's standing orders that limit the papers to 20 pages. This is a reassigned case and the undersigned does not usually practice in this district. After conferring with Opposing Counsel, she kindly agreed that Defendant could file an unopposed motion for leave to amend Defendant's brief to conform with the 20-page limit.

Defendant apologizes to this Court and to Opposing Counsel for the oversight and will ensure this does not happen again. As a remedy, Defendant has edited her brief from 29 pages to 20 to conform with the page limit, and she is requesting that this Court accept her amended brief, with all other dates in the scheduling order extended accordingly, to allow for Plaintiff to submit her reply brief based on the amended filing.

Defendant has attached her amended brief to this motion in case this Court would prefer the Clerk to file the amended brief. Alternatively, if your honor grants leave, then Defendant will file her amended brief.

PROPOSED ORDER

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Defendant's Brief, it is so ordered. The Court accepts Defendant's amended brief. Plaintiff shall have 15 days from the filing of the amended brief to submit her reply brief.


Summaries of

Shah v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2023
2:22-cv-01830-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Shah v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:PARIMAL K. SHAH, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 22, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01830-AC (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2023)