Opinion
May 12, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).
We agree with the IAS Court that the Supreme Court was an appropriate forum for the instant declaratory judgment action commenced by plaintiff to establish his succession rights, since there was no summary proceeding pending in the Civil Court at the time the action was commenced, and defendants went forward with disclosure in the Supreme Court action without objection ( compare, Cox v. J.D. Realty Assocs., 217 A.D.2d 179). On the merits, we assume in defendant's favor that a person seeking succession rights under New York City Rent and Eviction Regulations (9 N.Y.CRR) § 2204.6 (d) (1) must show a two-year period of primary residence immediately prior to the tenants vacating of the apartment regardless of whether the tenant is a senior citizen. We find that such two-year period ended in April 1992 when plaintiff's grandmother moved into a nursing home, and conclude, as did the IAS Court, that the documentary evidence and plaintiff's uncontroverted testimony overwhelmingly show that the apartment was his primary residence during that period ( see, Lesser v. Park 65 Realty Corp., 140 A.D.2d 169, 174, lv dismissed 72 N.Y.2d 1042; 300 E. 34th St. Co. v. Habeeb, 248 A.D.2d 50). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Williams and Andrias, JJ.