From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sexton v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-98

03-26-2014

JOHNATHAN SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH LEE, et al., Defendants.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman


DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE ORDER AND REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 4);

(2) DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT NEIL; AND (3)

DISMISSING SOME CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS LEE AND OWENS

This case is before the Court on the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. (Doc. 4). The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Jim Neil be dismissed. (Id.) The Magistrate Judge further recommends that the Court dismiss claims against Defendants Lee and Owens stemming from: (1) the search and seizure of firearms from plaintiff's residence; (2) the search and seizure of plaintiff's "financial history and records" from Fifth/Third Bank; (3) the two police officers' interference with a plea bargain that was initially offered but later withdrawn by the prosecutor; and (4) false statements allegedly made by defendant Lee in the PSI report that was submitted to the trial court for consideration in determining plaintiff's sentence. Plaintiff filed no Objections to the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and the time for doing so has expired. The issues are now ripe.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), upon reviewing Plaintiff's filings and the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge de novo, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the recommendations set forth in the Order and Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in their entirety (Doc. 4); (2) DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Neil; and (3) DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lee and Owens stemming from the search and seizure of firearms from: (a) plaintiff's residence; (b) the search and seizure of plaintiff's "financial history and records" from Fifth/Third Bank; (c) the two police officers' interference with a plea bargain that was initially offered but later withdrawn by the prosecutor; and (d) false statements allegedly made by defendant Lee in the PSI report that was submitted to the trial court for consideration in determining plaintiff's sentence. This case shall proceed as set forth in the Order and Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sexton v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 26, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2014)
Case details for

Sexton v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:JOHNATHAN SEXTON, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH LEE, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-98 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2014)

Citing Cases

Pettus-Brown v. Cooper

The same principle enunciated in Heck with respect to § 1983 claims also applies to conspiracy claims brought…