holding that docking accrued leave or compensatory time for partial day absences will not defeat salaried status because leave and compensatory time does not constitute salary for the purposes of § 541.118 test
Summary of this case from Schmitt v. State of Kan.No. 89-3329.
September 4, 1990.
Appeal from the W.D.N.C., 720 F.Supp. 1196.
AFFIRMED IN PART, REMANDED IN PART.
holding that docking accrued leave or compensatory time for partial day absences will not defeat salaried status because leave and compensatory time does not constitute salary for the purposes of § 541.118 test
Summary of this case from Schmitt v. State of Kan.holding that docking accrued leave or compensatory time for partial day absences did not defeat salaried status because leave and compensatory time does not constitute a salary for the purposes of § 541.118 test
Summary of this case from Futral v. Dept., Pub. Saf.explaining that "the docking of leave or accrued compensatory time for absences of less than an entire day [will not] defeat salaried status"
Summary of this case from Eaton v. Commonwealth Health Sys.docking of personal or sick leave time is not a deduction of salary that defeats FLSA exemption for "salary basis" employees
Summary of this case from Yuen v. U.S. Asia Commercial Development Corp.Full title:Sewell Plastics Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Date published: Sep 4, 1990
The district court awarded summary judgment to the County, holding that all of the Captains are exempt…
Thomas v. County of FairfaxFor example, in Hartman v. Arlington County, Virginia, 720 F. Supp. 1227, 1229 (E.D.Va. 1989), aff'd, 903…