From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-1095

04-03-2012

DENISE L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC., Defendant - Appellee.

Denise L. Severino-Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00336-BR)

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Denise L. Severino-Todd, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Kerr Adams, Angela Byrd Cummings, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Denise L. Severino-Todd appeals the district court's order granting the Defendant's motion to dismiss her employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2 0 0 0e-2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc., No. 5:11-cv-336-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2012
470 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Severino-Todd v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DENISE L. SEVERINO-TODD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WAL-MART, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

470 F. App'x 139 (4th Cir. 2012)