From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 1, 2006
111 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 2006)

Opinion

No. 2006-0268.

Submitted August 9, 2006.

Decided November 1, 2006.

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2002-A-1925, 2002-A-2019, 2004-A-843, and 2004-A-851.

Martin Hughes Associates, Martin J. Hughes III, and Jackie Lynn Hager, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Squire, Sanders Dempsey, L.L.P., Greg R. Wehrer, and Steven F. Mount, for appellee and cross-appellant.


{¶ 1} The appeal and the cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, on the authority of Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents for the reason stated in his dissent in Olympic Steel, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 110 Ohio St.3d 1242, 2006-Ohio-4091, 852 N.E.2d 178, ¶ 5.


Summaries of

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 1, 2006
111 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 2006)
Case details for

Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin County Board of Revision

Case Details

Full title:SEVEN SEVENTEEN HB PHILADELPHIA NO. 2, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 1, 2006

Citations

111 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 2006)
2006 Ohio 5608