The Appellant is not acting in good faith or with clean hands; and (3) If the Court did not have jurisdiction over the policy or its beneficiary at the time of the granting of the Decree, then when the policy was cashed in, it lost its characterization as an asset over which it did not have jurisdiction and become one which it did. In Sessions v. Sessions, 525 P.2d 1269 (Okla. App. 1974)1, decedent's prior wife sued his widow to impress a constructive trust on the proceeds of a National Service Life Insurance policy. Decedent had been ordered by an Oklahoma District Court, in a divorce case, to keep the National Service Life Insurance policy in force and to make the prior wife the beneficiary until all alimony had been paid.
Concerning the jointly acquired debts, the court ordered Husband to be solely responsible. Husband contends the court had no power to force him to change contractual relations between Wife and third parties, citing Gardner v. Gardner, 629 P.2d 1283 (Okla.App. 1981), and Sessions v. Sessions, 525 P.2d 1269 (Okla.App. 1974). Wife argues that the order merely contemplates a good faith effort on Husband's part to obtain a release of Wife by means acceptable to third party creditors.