From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Session v. Session

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 8, 1929
123 So. 639 (La. 1929)

Opinion

No. 29451.

June 17, 1929. Rehearing Denied July 8, 1929.

Appeal from First District Court, Parish of Caddo; Robert Roberts, Judge.

Smitherman, Tucker Mason, of Shreveport, for plaintiff and appellee.

B.H. Lichtenstein, of Shreveport, for defendant and appellant.


The defendant has appealed from a judgment of separation from bed and board. The cause for the separation was cruel treatment on the part of the defendant, of such a nature as to make it intolerable for the plaintiff to live with him. On two occasions he abused her mercilessly, and on one of those occasions slapped her and threatened to kill her. She left in great fear of him, and has been afraid ever since to return. His defense is that his anger and abuse of his wife was provoked by a grave indiscretion on her part. There is some truth in the plea, but we are not prepared to say that the district judge erred in his finding that the provocation was not justification for the defendant's cruelty towards his wife. It is now nearly three years since she left him, and it is not more likely now that they would become reconciled without a decree of separation than with one. There is no question of law in the case; and the record does not disclose that the district judge was in error as to the facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

OVERTON, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Session v. Session

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 8, 1929
123 So. 639 (La. 1929)
Case details for

Session v. Session

Case Details

Full title:JULAI TOWNSEL SESSION v. PLEAS SESSION

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 8, 1929

Citations

123 So. 639 (La. 1929)
123 So. 639