From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Servin v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 17, 2015
2:14-cv-2999 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2015)

Opinion


EDWARD JAMES SERVIN, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:14-cv-2999 JAM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 17, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a California state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the California Department of Corrections ("CDCR"), CDCR Secretary J. Beard, CDCR Chief Counsel B. Rice, and Folsom State Prison Warden R. Rackley. ECF No. 1.

         By order dated January 15, 2015, the court construed plaintiff's complaint as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and directed plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days of the date of the order. ECF No. 5. In response, plaintiff filed a document entitled "Plaintiff's Objections to Reclassification of Declaratory Judgment, " ECF No. 6, but did not file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the required filing fees totaling $400.00.

Although the complaint is extremely vague, the exhibit attached to the complaint suggests that plaintiff seeks to enjoin defendants from transferring him to an out of state prison. See ECF No. 1, Exh. A at 13 (letter to plaintiff from defendant Warden Rackley).

In his objections, plaintiff asserts that he did not file a § 1983 civil rights action and instead purports to bring his claim for declaratory and injunctive relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202. ECF No. 6.

         Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $50.00 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to pay the filing fees or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $50.00 administrative fee.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

         2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Servin v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 17, 2015
2:14-cv-2999 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Servin v. California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JAMES SERVIN, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 17, 2015

Citations

2:14-cv-2999 JAM AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2015)