From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Servidone Constr. v. S.E. Materials

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 5, 1982
421 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-2384.

November 5, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Guy W. Spicola, J.

Charles F. Clark and Ted R. Manry, III of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison Kelly, Tampa, for appellant.

Michael C. Addison, Tampa, for appellee.


After carefully reviewing the record and briefs in this case, we have concluded that the trial court erred in reasoning that the riprap and bedding stone was delivered "as needed" in accordance with the contract terms solely on the basis of its finding that the progress of the construction project in which appellant Servidone Construction Corporation was engaged was not impeded by the absence of materials appellee Southeast Materials Corporation was to supply. Nevertheless, the remaining findings by the trial court are supported by the evidence and are sufficient to sustain the final judgment.

Accordingly, the final judgment is AFFIRMED.

BOARDMAN, A.C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Servidone Constr. v. S.E. Materials

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 5, 1982
421 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Servidone Constr. v. S.E. Materials

Case Details

Full title:SERVIDONE CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. SOUTHEAST MATERIALS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 5, 1982

Citations

421 So. 2d 695 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Perry v. Young

Upon review of the record we conclude that the trial court's judgment is supported by competent, substantial…