From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seoul Viosys Co. v. P3 Int'l Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2020
2019-2384 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2020)

Opinion

2019-2384

06-15-2020

SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. P3 INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee

MICHAEL EISENBERG, Holland & Knight, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARGUERITE DEL VALLE, Power Del Valle LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JAMES A. POWER, JR.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:16-cv-06276-AJN-SN, Judge Alison J. Nathan.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL EISENBERG, Holland & Knight, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARGUERITE DEL VALLE, Power Del Valle LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by JAMES A. POWER, JR. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Seoul Viosys Co. v. P3 Int'l Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 15, 2020
2019-2384 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Seoul Viosys Co. v. P3 Int'l Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. P3 INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2020

Citations

2019-2384 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2020)

Citing Cases

Seoul Viosys Co. v. P3 Int'l Corp.

The Court entered judgment and the Federal Circuit affirmed without opinion. See Seoul Viosys Co. v. P3 Int'l…