From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sentinery v. U.S. Gov't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 2, 2018
No. CV-17-03952-PHX-BSB (D. Ariz. Feb. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV-17-03952-PHX-BSB

02-02-2018

Allen Sentinery, Plaintiff, v. United States Government, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Doc. 10.) The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade for a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 7.) On January 8, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation with this Court. (Doc. 11.) No objections have been filed.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991). Parties have fourteen days from the service of a copy of the Magistrate's recommendation within which to file specific written objections to the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72. Failure to object to a Magistrate Judge's recommendation relieves the Court of conducting de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's factual findings and waives all objections to those findings on appeal. See Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998). A failure to object to a Magistrate Judge's conclusion "is a factor to be weighed in considering the propriety of finding waiver of an issue on appeal." Id.

DISCUSSION

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no Objections having been made by any party thereto, the Court hereby incorporates and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 10) invokes federal question jurisdiction and alleges claims pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 402 U.S. 388 (1971). (Doc. 11 at 3-4.) The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's findings that the Amended Complaint fails to state a valid claim under Bivens and that no Bivens remedy is available against federal agencies. (Id. at 4-5.) Therefore, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. 12(b)(6).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 11.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, terminating this case. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

Dated this 2nd day of February, 2018.

/s/_________

Honorable Stephen M. McNamee

Senior United States District Judge CC: BSB


Summaries of

Sentinery v. U.S. Gov't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 2, 2018
No. CV-17-03952-PHX-BSB (D. Ariz. Feb. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Sentinery v. U.S. Gov't

Case Details

Full title:Allen Sentinery, Plaintiff, v. United States Government, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 2, 2018

Citations

No. CV-17-03952-PHX-BSB (D. Ariz. Feb. 2, 2018)