From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sentell v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 2, 2012
CIV 09-4056 (D.S.D. Nov. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CIV 09-4056

11-02-2012

MICHAEL D. SENTELL and MARY L. ODLAND, Plaintiffs, v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., a California corporation; YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Georgia corporation; and YAMAHA MOTOR COMPANY, LTD., a foreign corporation, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has been advised that the case has been settled. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and with prejudice, each party to pay their own costs. Any party, on good cause shown on or before December 10, 2012, may move to vacate this Order of Dismissal and reopen this action if settlement is not consummated. The Court also retains ancillary jurisdiction to enforce all settlement agreements entered into by the parties and their representatives. See Harris v. Arkansas State Highway and Transp. Dep't, 437 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2006).

BY THE COURT:

____________

Lawrence L. Piersol

United States District Judge
ATTEST:
JOSEPH HAAS, CLERK
BY: ___________

DEPUTY


Summaries of

Sentell v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 2, 2012
CIV 09-4056 (D.S.D. Nov. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Sentell v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL D. SENTELL and MARY L. ODLAND, Plaintiffs, v. YAMAHA MOTOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

CIV 09-4056 (D.S.D. Nov. 2, 2012)