From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Senior v. Harvest Grove Apartments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 2, 2013
Civil Action 2:13-cv-0247 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:13-cv-0247

04-02-2013

Teddy Glen Bostic Senior, Plaintiff v. Harvest Grove Apartments, et al., Defendants


Judge Sargus


Magistrate Judge Abel


ORDER

Plaintiff Teddy Glen Bostic Senior brought this civil rights action alleging that his neighbors have harassed him. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's March 19, 2013 Report and Recommendation on Initial Screening (doc. 3) that this case be dismissed because it fails to state a claim against any defendant under the constitution or laws of the United States. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's March 29, 2013 objections to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 5).

The complaint alleges there is a conspiracy to get plaintiff Bostic to move from his home at 5371 Harvestwood Lane, Columbus, Ohio. Apartment community residents and employees have bullied him. Bostic does not know why he is being harassed or why defendants want him to leave. He is being evicted by the owner of the apartment complex.

As the Report and Recommendation states, federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Gunn v. Minton,133 S.Ct. 1059, 1064 (2013); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). They may hear only claims arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. Id. Although there is clearly friction between Bostic and his landlord and neighbors and the complaint alleges that defendants are unreasonably acting to force him to leave the apartment complex, the complaint does not allege a claim arising under either the constitution or laws of the United States. No claim is pleaded for violation of the Fair Housing Act. See, 42 U.S.C. § 3604. Further, the complaint pleads claims against private individuals that are not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See, Lugar v. Edmonson Oil, 457 U.S. 922, 950 (1982).

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

________________

Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Senior v. Harvest Grove Apartments

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 2, 2013
Civil Action 2:13-cv-0247 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2013)
Case details for

Senior v. Harvest Grove Apartments

Case Details

Full title:Teddy Glen Bostic Senior, Plaintiff v. Harvest Grove Apartments, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 2, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:13-cv-0247 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 2, 2013)