From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seneca v. Novaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1981
80 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

March 30, 1981


In an action to recover a debt due upon a written agreement, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated October 20, 1980, which denied his motion to strike the defendant's demand for a jury trial and to restore the action to the Nonjury Calendar. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. The character of a defense and counterclaim is controlled by the substance of the facts alleged, and not solely by its prayer for relief (Wainwright Page v. Burr McAuley, 272 N.Y. 130; Auerbach v. Chase Nat. Bank of City of N.Y., 251 App. Div. 543). Plaintiff, Carlo Seneca, held 30 shares of stock as security for repayment of a $32,500 debt owed by defendant, Joseph Novaro. The security was entrusted to Seneca in a fiduciary capacity (see Morris v. Windsor Trust Co., 213 N.Y. 27, 31; Kono v. Roeth, 237 App. Div. 252). The basis for an equitable action for an accounting is the existence of a fiduciary or trust relation respecting the subject matter of the controversy (Darlagiannis v. Darlagiannis, 48 A.D.2d 875). In the instant case, the gravamen of Novaro's defense and counterclaim, from the facts alleged, is a breach of Seneca's fiduciary duty. Novaro contends that the security was prematurely sold, and for a fraction of its fair market value. Determination of the security's true worth so as to ascertain the reasonability of the sale and the extent of Novaro's loss necessitates an accounting. Breach of a fiduciary duty and an accounting sound in equity. Novaro's defense and counterclaim is therefore equitable in nature, and not triable by a jury (see CPLR 4101). Where a plaintiff brings a claim triable by jury and the defendant interposes a related counterclaim not triable by jury, the defendant is held to have waived a jury trial even on the main claim (Compact Electra Corp. v. Connell, 46 A.D.2d 649). Damiani, J.P., Gibbons, Margett and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Seneca v. Novaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 30, 1981
80 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Seneca v. Novaro

Case Details

Full title:CARLO SENECA, Appellant, v. JOSEPH A. NOVARO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Webster v. Forest Hills Care Ctr., LLC

Generally, to be entitled to an equitable accounting, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she has no…

Torrance Constr., Inc. v. Jaques

Plaintiff, on the other hand, contends that it is entitled to a jury trial because this action is inherently…