From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sence v. Atoynatan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 17, 2016
142 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

08-17-2016

Jaelin SENCE, etc., et al., appellants, v. Ioanis ATOYNATAN, etc., et al., defendants, New York Methodist Hospital, respondent.

Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, New York, N.Y. (Thomas A. Moore, Matthew Gaier, and Norman Bard of counsel), for appellants. Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch LLP (Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. [Edward J. Guardaro, Jr. ], of counsel), for respondent.


Kramer, Dillof, Livingston & Moore, New York, N.Y. (Thomas A. Moore, Matthew Gaier, and Norman Bard of counsel), for appellants.

Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch LLP (Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP, Valhalla, N.Y. [Edward J. Guardaro, Jr. ], of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), dated September 24, 2014, which granted the motion of the defendant New York Methodist Hospital pursuant to CPLR 2601, inter alia, for leave to pay the limits of its insurance policy into court.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

CPLR 2601(a) provides that “[a] party paying money into court pursuant to the direction of the court is discharged thereby from all further liability to the extent of the money so paid in.” Here, following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against, among others, the defendant New York Methodist Hospital (hereinafter NYMH), after adjustments pursuant to Public Health Law § 2999–j(6)(b) and (14), in the total present value sum of $13,815,290, the Supreme Court granted NYMH's motion pursuant to CPLR 2601, inter alia, for leave to pay the full amount of its insurance policy, $7,500,000, into court, in order to stop the accrual of interest on that amount. Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the court properly permitted NYMH to pay the limits of its insurance policy into court (see Schmitt v. Werner Enters., Inc., 277 A.D.2d 1003, 716 N.Y.S.2d 505 ; Hiraldo v. Khan, 262 A.D.2d 607, 693 N.Y.S.2d 612 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MILLER, HINDS–RADIX and LaSALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sence v. Atoynatan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 17, 2016
142 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Sence v. Atoynatan

Case Details

Full title:Jaelin SENCE, etc., et al., appellants, v. Ioanis ATOYNATAN, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 17, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
36 N.Y.S.3d 603
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5802

Citing Cases

Sence v. Atoynatan

The damages award for past pain and suffering deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation…

Sence v. Atoynatan

In an order dated September 24, 2014, the Supreme Court granted NYMH's motion pursuant to CPLR 2601, inter…