From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sellers v. Univ. of Rio Grande

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00005 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-CV-00005

04-04-2013

DUSHAWN SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE, Defendant.


JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp


ORDER

On February 28, 2013, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 51.) The record reflects that Plaintiff's response was due on March 25, 2013. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not responded to the Motion. If Plaintiff wishes to respond to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment she is DIRECTED to move for leave to respond WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS of this Order. Any motion for leave should include Plaintiff's proposed response as an attachment. Plaintiff shall also state whether Defendant opposes leave to respond.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

EDMUND A. SARGUS , JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sellers v. Univ. of Rio Grande

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Apr 4, 2013
Case No. 2:12-CV-00005 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Sellers v. Univ. of Rio Grande

Case Details

Full title:DUSHAWN SELLERS, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-CV-00005 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2013)