From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seidel v. Powers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Feb 11, 2009
CV 06-4638-DDP (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)

Opinion


DANIEL KENT SEIDEL, Petitioner, v. K. MENDOZA POWERS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-4638-DDP (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. February 11, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

         1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

         2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

         3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Seidel v. Powers

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Feb 11, 2009
CV 06-4638-DDP (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Seidel v. Powers

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL KENT SEIDEL, Petitioner, v. K. MENDOZA POWERS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Citations

CV 06-4638-DDP (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2009)