From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segura v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jun 7, 2012
NO. 01-11-00578-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-11-00578-CR

06-07-2012

JOSE ANGEL SEGURA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 306074


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Jose Angel Segura, was convicted by a jury of the Class B misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.§ 49.04 (West 2011). The trial court assessed a sentence of 10 days in the county jail. After timely filing a notice of appeal on appellant's behalf, appellant's appointed trial counsel was permitted to withdraw from the case.

Because the record contained no indication that appellant desired to proceed pro se, that appellant had retained appellate counsel, or that the trial court had appointed counsel to represent appellate counsel, this Court abated the appeal and ordered the case remanded to the trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant still desired to pursue this appeal and, if so, the status of appellant's representation on appeal. See, e.g., Ward v. State, 740 S.W.2d 794, 798 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) (requiring that, after permitting appointed trial counsel to withdraw, trial court must either find that appellant is knowingly and voluntarily waiving right to appointed counsel or appoint appellate counsel).

The trial court conducted the hearing on May 12, 2012. The reporter's record of those proceedings has been filed in this Court.

At the hearing, appellant stated on the record in open court that he no longer wished to continue this appeal. When further questioned by the trial court, appellant stated: "No, I don't want to appeal."

We order the appeal reinstated. Appellant has not filed a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). However, given appellant's expressed desire on the record in open court to forego pursuit of his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. We have not issued a decision in the appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

We direct the Clerk to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Segura v. State

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jun 7, 2012
NO. 01-11-00578-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Segura v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ANGEL SEGURA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-11-00578-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 7, 2012)