From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segovia-Reyna v. Cruz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-6099 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-6099 (MJD/SRN).

February 4, 2009


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson dated November 21, 2008.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation dated November 21, 2008.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Application for Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2141 [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Segovia-Reyna v. Cruz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 4, 2009
Civil No. 08-6099 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Segovia-Reyna v. Cruz

Case Details

Full title:Miguel Angel Segovia-Reyna, Petitioner, v. Warden M. Cruz, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 4, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-6099 (MJD/SRN) (D. Minn. Feb. 4, 2009)

Citing Cases

Somerville v. Pitt

Although Somerville may have believed that an RRC placement in the state of his choosing would have…

Castro v. Graber

Although Castro may believe that a longer RRC placement would benefit him, a petitioner "is not entitled to a…