From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Segalla v. Town of Amenia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2003
309 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06472

Argued September 8, 2003.

October 6, 2003.

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs have a valid, nonconforming use of a certain parcel of land for mining of natural aggregate materials, including quarrying, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated June 12, 2002, as granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Wichler Gobetz, P.C., Suffern, N.Y. (Kenneth C. Gobetz of counsel), for appellants.

Daniels and Porco, LLP, Pawling, N.Y. (Michael G. Hayes of counsel), for respondent.

Zarin Steinmetz, White Plains, N.Y. (Michael D. Zarin and Mark R. Rielly of counsel), for Oblong Valley Association, amicus curiae.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., SANDRA L. TOWNES, BARRY A. COZIER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiffs' failure to exhaust their administrative remedies or to establish that the pursuit of such remedies would have been futile required dismissal of the complaint ( see Watergate II Apts. v. Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 N.Y.2d 52; Town of Islip v. Zalak, 165 A.D.2d 83, 94-97; cf. 360 Jericho Turnpike Assocs. v. Incorporated Vil. of Mineola, 261 A.D.2d 468).

SMITH, J.P., TOWNES, COZIER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Segalla v. Town of Amenia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 2003
309 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Segalla v. Town of Amenia

Case Details

Full title:JOHN A. SEGALLA, JR., ET AL., appellants, v. TOWN OF AMENIA, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 256

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Podolsky

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the…

In Matter of Aliano v. Oliva

Nor is the doctrine of equitable estoppel available to petitioner as a defense as petitioner was aware of the…