From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sefton v. Eyeblaster Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 14, 2006
Civil Action: H-06-3484 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action: H-06-3484.

March 14, 2006


ORDER


Before the court is defendants' motion requiring plaintiff to post bond as security for costs. (Dkt. 25). A district court has inherent power to require security for costs when warranted by the circumstances of the case. Ehm v. Amtrak, 780 F.2d 516, 517 (5th Cir. 1986). Defendants have not presented circumstances warranting the posting of a bond. Accordingly, defendants' motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Sefton v. Eyeblaster Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Mar 14, 2006
Civil Action: H-06-3484 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2006)
Case details for

Sefton v. Eyeblaster Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David Sefton, Plaintiff, v. Eyeblaster, Inc., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Mar 14, 2006

Citations

Civil Action: H-06-3484 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 14, 2006)