From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 19, 2010
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM.

July 19, 2010


ORDER


Upon due consideration of the Receiver's written submissions, together with the representations made and the issues discussed at the hearing held in this case this day, it is ordered and adjudged as follows:

1) The Receiver's Emergency Motion for Possession of Funds as supplemented (Dkts. 434 437) is denied as moot inasmuch as the Receiver now has possession of the income tax refund checks which were the subject of the motion.

2) The Receiver's Emergency Motion for an Order to Show Cause as supplemented (Dkts. 434 437) is denied because the Court is satisfied that Marguerite Nadel, Michael Zucker, and John Lopez are now well aware of the responsibilities imposed on them by this Court's previous orders and have assured the Court that they will abide by those responsibilities in the future.

DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 19, 2010
CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Securities Exchange Commission v. Nadel

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR NADEL, SCOOP…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 19, 2010

Citations

CASE NO: 8:09-cv-87-T-26TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 19, 2010)