From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tuig

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division
Mar 4, 2011
SACV06-172 AHS (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2011)

Opinion


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LAMBERT VANDER TUIG, et al., Defendants. No. SACV06-172 AHS (MLGx) United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. March 4, 2011

          FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AGAINST THE CAROLINA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.

          ALICEMARIE H. STOTLER, District Judge.

         The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") filed a Complaint (Docket # 1) against The Carolina Development Company, Inc. ("Carolina" or "Defendant") and others on or about February 16, 2006. The Court appointed Thomas A. Seaman as Receiver of Carolina on or about February 16, 2006 (Docket # 13). The Commission requests this Court to enter a Final Judgment against Carolina. Based on the foregoing, the Court rules as follows:

         I.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.

         II.

         IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly:

(a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;

(b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or

(c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser.

         III.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant, and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e (a) and (c)] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption:

(a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of the means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise;

(b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or

(c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h).

         IV.

         IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for disgorgement of $52, 622, 339.99 in ill-gotten gains as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with pre-judgment interest thereon in the amount of $4, 256, 764.01, for a total amount of $56, 879, 104.00. The court-appointed Receiver shall, pursuant to order of this Court, liquidate and convert into money all assets belonging to Defendant. To facilitate the Receiver's identification, marshaling and liquidation of assets of the Defendant, the Order freezing assets and prohibiting destruction of documents (Docket # 12) and all extensions and amendments of that Order, imposed pursuant to stipulation, Court order or otherwise, shall remain effective until further order of the Court. Any disgorgement and/or prejudgment interest not collected at the conclusion of the Receivership shall be waived, upon submission of the final accounting prepared by the Receiver and approval thereof by this Court.

         V.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.

         VI.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

         VII.

         There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.


Summaries of

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tuig

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division
Mar 4, 2011
SACV06-172 AHS (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tuig

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LAMBERT VANDER TUIG, et…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2011

Citations

SACV06-172 AHS (MLGx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2011)