Summary
affirming denial of visitation rights, despite contention that visitation would be in child's best interest, where there is no statutory authority or other authority granting court with jurisdiction to order such visitation rights
Summary of this case from Youmans v. RamosOpinion
No. 94-3559.
April 7, 1995.
Appeal from the Santa Rosa County Circuit Court, Paul Rasmussen, J.
Maureen Logue McGill, Pensacola, for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.
Although we are sympathetic with appellant's contention that visitation between F.G., a dependent child, and her half-siblings would be in F.G.'s best interest, we are not aware of any statutory or other authority that would vest the trial court with jurisdiction to order such visitation. Accordingly, we affirm the order on appeal.
ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.