Secchiari v. Ruvin

Full title: Clark SECCHIARI, etc., Appellant, v. Harvey RUVIN, etc., Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Oct 13, 2021

326 So. 3d 225 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D21-0198

10-13-2021

Clark SECCHIARI, etc., Appellant, v. Harvey RUVIN, etc., Appellee.

Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz LLP, and Zachary D. Ludens and Edward H. Zebersky (Fort Lauderdale); Law Offices of Randy Maultasch, and Randy S. Maultasch, for appellant. Holland & Knight LLP, and Christopher Bellows and Cory W. Eichhorn and Philip E. Rothschild (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Zebersky Payne Shaw Lewenz LLP, and Zachary D. Ludens and Edward H. Zebersky (Fort Lauderdale); Law Offices of Randy Maultasch, and Randy S. Maultasch, for appellant.

Holland & Knight LLP, and Christopher Bellows and Cory W. Eichhorn and Philip E. Rothschild (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Zoba v. City of Coral Springs, 189 So. 3d 888, 891-92 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (performing a functional analysis of the clerk's acts under a separate statutory scheme and determining that "[t]he clerk's act of collection, apportionment, and disbursement is part of that judicial process—it is a judicial act entitling the clerk to [quasi-judicial] immunity").