From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Chowdhury

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 24, 2024
8:23-cv-01741 CJC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-01741 CJC (DFMx)

01-24-2024

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. FAIZ M. CHOWDHURY, DTI HOLDINGS, INC. and QUANTUM AGE CORPORATION, Defendants.


PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL PERSONAL AND BUSINESS INFORMATION

Hon. Douglas F. McCormick United States Magistrate Judge

The Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission and Defendants Faiz M. Chowdhury, DTI Holdings, Inc. and Quantum Age Corporation, having jointly moved for entry of this protective order regarding confidential personal information, the Court hereby grants that joint motion and ORDERS as follows:

This Protective Order applies to all Confidential Information, as defined below, contained in any document, electronically stored information, or other material of any type produced or obtained through initial disclosures or discovery in this litigation or during the Commission's pre-filing investigation relating to the subject of this litigation. This Protective Order does not address other types of potentially confidential information and the parties have indicated that subsequent agreements or orders may address disclosure of such other types of information.

As used in this Protective Order, the term “Confidential Information” means the following information:

(a) trade secrets, intellectual property competitive information, and/or confidential financial or business information, and identified and designated by a Party as Confidential Information; or
(b) regarding any individual or entity: social security number; taxpayer identification number; birth date; credit records; tax, medical, and criminal records; and bank, brokerage, and financial institution account numbers;

provided, however, information is not Confidential Information if it is publicly available, including from governmental agencies.

This Protective Order does not restrict disclosure of materials from which the Confidential Information has been redacted or obscured.

Confidential Information produced or obtained through initial disclosures or other discovery in this litigation, or during the Commission's pre-filing investigation relating to the subject of this litigation, shall be maintained as confidential and shall not be disclosed without the consent of the producing party or the individual whose personal information is at issue or pursuant to further court order, except that Confidential Information may be disclosed without consent or order to the following: (a) the parties to this action, their counsel, counsel's support personnel, and other Commission personnel; (b) consultants, expert witnesses, and vendors retained for this litigation, provided such persons complete a stipulated compliance certification; (c) persons who prepared or compiled the Confidential Information or received the Confidential Information prior to the date of this Protective Order; (d) witnesses (or their counsel) noticed for deposition or designated as a trial witnesses, or who are expected to be so noticed or designated, to the extent reasonably necessary to prepare for or conduct their testimony or to review the transcript of their depositions; (e) other individuals believed to have information relevant to this litigation, to the extent disclosure has been determined by counsel to be reasonably necessary for the prosecution or defense of this matter; (f) judges, magistrate judges, mediators, court reporters, and other court-related personnel involved with this matter, subject to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2 and any other applicable limitation on disclosure of confidential information in judicial proceedings, and (g) federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies.

Nothing in this Protective Order is intended to (a) prevent a party that produced Confidential Information from making use of that Confidential Information in its own business operations or disclosing that information to the extent required by law, (b) prevent a party that has produced or received Confidential Information from using or referring to such information in response to discovery in this litigation; or (c) restrict the use or disclosure of information produced or received other than in connection with this litigation or the Commission's pre-filing investigation.

If the parties disagree as to whether information is Confidential Information within the scope of this Protective Order, the party seeking to disclose the information may seek a ruling from this Court. The information in dispute shall be deemed Confidential Information until the Court rules or the question is resolved by agreement of the parties.

If a party that has obtained Confidential Information (or an employee, attorney, expert, or other representative of such a party) receives a subpoena or other disclosure request from a non-party seeking any such Confidential Information, the party receiving the disclosure request shall within seven days provide notice of the disclosure request to the party that produced the Confidential Information.

Except as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2, Confidential Information may be filed with the Court only (i) under seal or after a determination by the Court that the information at issue need not be sealed, (ii) pursuant to court order, (iii) by agreement of the party that produced the information, or (iv) by consent of the individual whose personal information is at issue. A party seeking to file Confidential Information under seal must file a motion to seal.

In the event additional parties are joined in this litigation, they shall not be provided access to Confidential Information until they have each executed and filed a statement agreeing to be bound by this Protective Order.

Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any privilege recognized by law, or shall be deemed an admission as to the admissibility of any facts or documents revealed in the course of disclosure. Subject to the Federal Rules of Evidence, Confidential Information may be offered and received into evidence at trial or at any hearing or oral argument. Any party may move the Court for an order that Confidential Information be reviewed in camera or under other conditions to prevent unnecessary disclosure. Unless otherwise ordered, in the event that any Party determines to use any Confidential Information at trial or any hearing to be held in open court, such Party shall so advise the relevant Designating Party five business (5) days in advance, and seek to challenge the designations of such Confidential Information.

Unless otherwise ordered, this Protective Order shall remain in force after dismissal or entry of final judgment. Additional protective orders may be requested with regard to other types of potentially confidential information or to supersede this Protective Order. Upon final termination of this Action, including all appeals, each party shall make reasonable efforts to destroy all Confidential Information received during discovery. The destroying party shall notify the producing party when destruction under this provision is complete. If a party is unable to destroy all Confidential Information, that material shall be returned to the Producing Party or the Producing Party's counsel. This Protective Order shall survive the final termination of this action, and it shall be binding on the parties and their legal counsel in the future.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Chowdhury

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 24, 2024
8:23-cv-01741 CJC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Chowdhury

Case Details

Full title:SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. FAIZ M. CHOWDHURY, DTI…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 24, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-01741 CJC (DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2024)