From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SEAY v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 18, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-01044 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-01044.

March 18, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Glenda A. Seay's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. No. 21) ("Motion"), which was accompanied by a supporting Brief (Doc. No. 23), to which Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response (Doc. No. 28). Magistrate Judge Knowles issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 29) ("Report") recommending that Motion should be denied and that the decision of the Commissioner should be affirmed, id. at 1. The Report was filed on February 28, 2011, and fourteen days have passed without the raising of objections by either party.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

SEAY v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 18, 2011
Case No. 3:09-cv-01044 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2011)
Case details for

SEAY v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:GLENDA D. SEAY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Mar 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-01044 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Strain v. Colvin

Furthermore, the VE's testimony based on the sit/stand restriction does not conflict with the DOT but instead…

Jones v. Colvin

Instead, courts have found that a VE's testimony based on a sit/stand restriction provides "more specific…