From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaton v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 11, 2016
NO. 02-16-00018-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-16-00018-CR

02-11-2016

THOMAS ISSAC SEATON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 1402730D MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Appellant Thomas Issac Seaton attempts to appeal from a judgment convicting him of possession of between one and four grams of methamphetamine. The trial court's certification states that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On January 15, 2016, we notified Seaton that the appeal would be dismissed pursuant to the trial court's certification unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response on or before January 25, 2016, showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 44.3. Seaton filed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Therefore, in accordance with the trial court's certification, we dismiss the appeal.See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

We deny Seaton's request to transfer this cause to another county. --------

PER CURIAM PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: February 11, 2016


Summaries of

Seaton v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Feb 11, 2016
NO. 02-16-00018-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)
Case details for

Seaton v. State

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS ISSAC SEATON APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Feb 11, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-16-00018-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 11, 2016)