Summary
finding the disagreement with the efficacy of the recommended treatment or his preference for a different course of treatment does not state a constitutional claim
Summary of this case from Ray v. Corizon Med. Grp.Opinion
Case No. 7:11-cv-03176-VEH-JHE
08-07-2014
TIMOTHY ALLEN SEARS, Plaintiff, v. KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on July 15, 2014, recommending that the defendants' motions for summary judgment be granted and this cause be dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 62.) No objections have been filed by any party.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and his recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Court EXPRESSLY FINDS that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, defendants' motions for summary judgment are due to be GRANTED and this action is due to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE this 7th day of August, 2014.
/s/_________
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS
United States District Judge