From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searles v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 2004
885 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 2004)

Opinion

No. SC02-1254.

September 30, 2004.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District — Case No. 2D00-2781 (Lee County).

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Jeffrey Sullivan, Special Assistant Public Defender, Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Petitioner.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Respondent.


We have for review the decision in Searles v. State, 816 So.2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), which expressly and directly conflicts with this Court's decision in Cardenas v. State, 867 So.2d 384 (Fla. 2004), on the harmless error analysis to be applied in DUI cases in which an instruction on the statutory presumption of impairment is given in error. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)( 3), Fla. Const. We accept this case for review, quash the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our opinion in Cardenas.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO and BELL, JJ., concur.

WELLS and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Searles v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Sep 30, 2004
885 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 2004)
Case details for

Searles v. State

Case Details

Full title:Adam Frank SEARLES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Sep 30, 2004

Citations

885 So. 2d 338 (Fla. 2004)

Citing Cases

Searles v. State

ALTENBERND, Chief Judge. By its opinion in Searles v. State, 885 So.2d 338 (Fla. 2004), the Florida Supreme…