From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Searcy v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-1556 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-1556

12-20-2012

EDGAR SEARCY FED. REG. #04726-031 v. JOSEPH P. YOUNG, ET AL


JUDGE MINALDI


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 12] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's separate motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining [Doc. 10] order is DENIED.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this ___ day of ___, 2012.

_________________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Searcy v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Dec 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-1556 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Searcy v. Young

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR SEARCY FED. REG. #04726-031 v. JOSEPH P. YOUNG, ET AL

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-1556 (W.D. La. Dec. 20, 2012)