From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seamster v. Uddin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2023
2:21-cv-0972 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0972 AC P

04-05-2023

LENZO SEAMSTER, Plaintiff, v. MESKATH UDDIN, Defendant.


Action Filed: June 1, 2021

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO OPT OUT OF POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On April 5, 2023, Defendant M. Uddin filed a motion to opt out of this Court's postscreening ADR Project. ECF No. 17. After reviewing the notice and request, filed concurrently with the declaration of counsel in support thereof, the Court finds good cause to grant the request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion to opt out (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED;

2. The stay of this action is LIFTED; and

3. Defendant shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file a responsive pleading.


Summaries of

Seamster v. Uddin

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2023
2:21-cv-0972 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Seamster v. Uddin

Case Details

Full title:LENZO SEAMSTER, Plaintiff, v. MESKATH UDDIN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 5, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0972 AC P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2023)