From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seals v. Capital Transit Co.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jan 11, 1940
1 F.R.D. 133 (D.D.C. 1940)

Opinion

         At Law. Action by Irene Seals against the Capital Transit Company. On motion to require defendant to produce statements of witnesses taken in preparation for trial.

         Motion denied.

          Leonard J. Ganse and Meta P. Hilgeson, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

          S. R. Bowen, R. E. Lee Goff, G. Thomas Dunlop, and Edmond L. Jones, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant.


          LETTS, Associate Justice.

         Under Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the court is asked by plaintiff to require defendant to produce statements of witnesses taken by the defendant in preparation for trial.

         Such request should be predicated upon good cause shown. I find that plaintiff has not made a showing of good cause as required by the rule except that the statements signed by plaintiff in the possession of the defendant shall be produced.


Summaries of

Seals v. Capital Transit Co.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jan 11, 1940
1 F.R.D. 133 (D.D.C. 1940)
Case details for

Seals v. Capital Transit Co.

Case Details

Full title:SEALS v. CAPITAL TRANSIT CO.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Jan 11, 1940

Citations

1 F.R.D. 133 (D.D.C. 1940)

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Montvila v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc.

Kenealy v. Texas Co., D.C., 29 F.Supp. 502, 504; Rose Silk Mills v. Insurance Co. of North America, D.C., 29…

Stark v. American Dredging Co.

No line of demarcation in this respect can logically be drawn between statements obtained before a suit is…