From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Seaford Golf and Country Club v. Nemours Co.

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Sep 7, 2006
C. A. No. 05C-07-009 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 7, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. No. 05C-07-009 (THG).

September 7, 2006.

David R. Hackett, Esquire, Griffin Hackett, P.A., Georgetown, DE.

Arthur L. Dent, Esquire, Sarah E. Diluzio, Esquire, Potter, Anderson Corroon, LLP, Wilmington, DE.


Dear Counsel:

Plaintiff has filed a timely motion to reargue the decision entered on August 23, 2006. The Defendant has timely responded.

The purpose of reargument is very limited. I am satisfied the decision takes into account each of your respective positions as to the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment.

The Motion to Reargue is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Yours very truly,

T. Henley Graves


Summaries of

Seaford Golf and Country Club v. Nemours Co.

Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County
Sep 7, 2006
C. A. No. 05C-07-009 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 7, 2006)
Case details for

Seaford Golf and Country Club v. Nemours Co.

Case Details

Full title:Seaford Golf and Country Club v. E.I.DuPont de Nemours and Company

Court:Superior Court of Delaware, Sussex County

Date published: Sep 7, 2006

Citations

C. A. No. 05C-07-009 (THG) (Del. Super. Ct. Sep. 7, 2006)