S.D.G. v. Dep't of Children & Families (In re M.P.)

Full title: In the Interest of M.P., D.P., T.B., S.E.S.(1), S.E.S.(2), S.E.S.(3), and…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: May 21, 2021

317 So. 3d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 2D21-206

05-21-2021

In the INTEREST OF M.P., D.P., T.B., S.E.S.(1), S.E.S.(2), S.E.S.(3), and R.S., children. S.D.G., Appellant, v. Department of Children and Families and Guardian Ad Litem Program, Appellees.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, and Joseph Thye Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Myers, for Appellant. Meredith K. Hall, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Thomasina F. Moore and Sarah Todd Weitz, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, and Joseph Thye Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Meredith K. Hall, Children's Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellee Department of Children and Families.

Thomasina F. Moore and Sarah Todd Weitz, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, SLEET, and STARGEL, JJ., Concur.