From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scovil v. Fedex Ground Package Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 22, 2011
No. 1:10-cv-515-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cv-515-DBH

12-22-2011

WAYNE SCOVIL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a FedEx. Home Delivery, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY ORDER

On December 16, 2011, I vacated the Magistrate Judge's Order in a discovery dispute because it appeared that the plaintiffs had chosen not to contest the defendant's objection to its limitation on the number of depositions. (Docket Item 74). However, on December 21, 2011, I granted the plaintiffs' motion for leave to file late. (Docket Item 77). Therefore the Magistrate Judge's original Pretrial Discovery Order (Docket Item 69) is REINSTATED. Now I proceed to consider the defendant's objection to deposition limits in the Order and the plaintiffs' response.

After reviewing all the papers, I conclude that the Magistrate Judge's Order is eminently reasonable, and is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The objection is therefore overruled and the Pretrial Discovery Order is AFFIRMED.

SO ORDERED.

________________________

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scovil v. Fedex Ground Package Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Dec 22, 2011
No. 1:10-cv-515-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Scovil v. Fedex Ground Package Sys. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE SCOVIL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

Citations

No. 1:10-cv-515-DBH (D. Me. Dec. 22, 2011)