From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2015
2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)

Opinion

          JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND; ORDER

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         All parties herein, Plaintiff SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY ("Plaintiff") and Defendants SYNGEN, INC., PHILIP COELHO, PRINCE EMMANUEL, and TERRENCE WOLF ("Defendants"), collectively referred to as the "Parties, " have reached a joint stipulation regarding Plaintiff's deadline to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

         RECITALS

         WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, which is scheduled to be heard on September 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 6;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff's deadline to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is currently August 19, 2015;

         WHEREAS, the Parties agree to extend Plaintiff's deadline to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss until Monday, October 5, 2015;

         WHEREAS, no extensions have already been obtained by any party as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss;

         STIPULATION

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record as follows:

         1. Plaintiff's deadline to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended from August 19, 2015 until October 5, 2015.

          LOUIS H. CASTORIA, ESQ., SHEILA M. PHAM, ESQ., KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP, San Francisco, California, SABRINA HAURIN, ESQ., KEITH LITTLE, ESQ., BAILEY CAVALIERI, LLC, Columbus, Ohio, Attorneys for Plaintiff, SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY.

          MARY E. MCCUTCHEON, TYLER C. GERKING, FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL, LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants SYNGEN, INC., PHILIP COELHO, PRINCE EMMANLUEL, and TERRENCE WOLF.

          WHEREAS, the Parties jointly request that the Court set a new hearing date for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for September 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 6, on or after October 12, 2015, as is convenient to the Court.

          2. The Parties jointly request that the Court set a new hearing date for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for September 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 6, on or after October 12, 2015, as is convenient to the Court.


         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Having considered the foregoing Joint Stipulation of all Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

         1. Plaintiff's deadline to file and serve its opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is extended from August 19, 2015 until October 7, 2015;

         2. Defendant's reply brief shall be filed on or before October 14, 2015;

         3. The Court resets the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, currently scheduled for September 2, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, to October 21, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom #6.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2015
2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Syngen, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Plaintiff, v. SYNGEN…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 14, 2015

Citations

2:15-CV-00142-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2015)