From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Woodhams

Supreme Court of Colorado. Department Two
May 24, 1926
246 P. 1029 (Colo. 1926)

Opinion

No. 11,570.

Decided May 24, 1926.

On motion to dismiss writ of error.

Writ Dismissed.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Writ of Error — Dismissal. This case ruled by the opinion in Scott v. Woodhams, 79 Colo. 528.

Error to the District Court of Sedgwick County, Hon. H. E. Munson, Judge.

Mr. H. N. MARSHALL, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. ROLFSON HENDRICKS, for defendants in error.


DEFENDANTS in error W. H. Woodhams and Hattie Woodhams have filed a motion to dismiss the writ. The case is a companion case to No. 11,569, Scott v. Woodhams, et al., 79 Colo. 528, 246 Pac. 1027, differing from it only in the figures and the land involved. The questions raised, and argument made, are the same in each case. For reasons stated in the opinion filed in cause No. 11,569, the motion is sustained, and the writ dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE DENISON and MR. JUSTICE WHITFORD concur.


Summaries of

Scott v. Woodhams

Supreme Court of Colorado. Department Two
May 24, 1926
246 P. 1029 (Colo. 1926)
Case details for

Scott v. Woodhams

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT v. WOODHAMS, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Colorado. Department Two

Date published: May 24, 1926

Citations

246 P. 1029 (Colo. 1926)
246 P. 1029