From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 16, 2016
No. 4:15cv0793 HEA (E.D. Mo. Feb. 16, 2016)

Opinion

No. 4:15cv0793 HEA

02-16-2016

Maurice D. Scott, Petitioner, v. Troy Steele, Respondent.


OPINION , MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner moves for appointment of counsel (Doc. # 9). After considering the motion and the pleadings, the motion is denied without prejudice to refiling at a later time.

Petitioner has demonstrated, at this point, that he can adequately present his claims to the Court. Additionally, neither the factual nor the legal issues in this case appear complex.

The Court will entertain future motions for appointment of counsel as the case progresses.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice at this time.

Dated this 16th day of February, 2016.

/s/_________

HENRY EDWARD AUTREY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Steele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 16, 2016
No. 4:15cv0793 HEA (E.D. Mo. Feb. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Scott v. Steele

Case Details

Full title:Maurice D. Scott, Petitioner, v. Troy Steele, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 16, 2016

Citations

No. 4:15cv0793 HEA (E.D. Mo. Feb. 16, 2016)