From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 18, 1999
991 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 73520

OPINION FILED: May 18, 1999

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE STEVEN H. GOLDMAN.

Jacqueline K. McGreevy, Louisiana, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty., Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.


ORDER


Antwan Scott, movant, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Scott v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 18, 1999
991 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Scott v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTWAN SCOTT, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 18, 1999

Citations

991 S.W.2d 209 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)