From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC

03-25-2013

FLOYD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. J. PALMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION AND

DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO SEND

PLAINTIFF COURTESY COPY OF DOCKET


(Doc. 137)

Plaintiff Floyd Scott, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 29, 2009. On March 22, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking an order directing re-service of a motion, on the ground that Plaintiff received mail from the Office of the Attorney General addressed to him but containing documents relating to another inmate's case. Defendants responded to the motion on March 22, 2013, and stated that they did not send Plaintiff anything on or around that date pertaining to this case.

The Court cannot order re-service, as it appears that the envelope was merely misaddressed to Plaintiff. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. However, the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a courtesy copy of the docket. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Scott v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. J. PALMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)