From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC

02-28-2013

FLOYD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. J. PALMER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING SURREPLY


(Doc. 128)

On February 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a surreply relating to Defendants' motion for reconsideration, which was filed on January 11, 2013.

Plaintiff does not have the right to file a surreply under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules, he did not seek leave of court, and the motion in question was granted on February 24, 2013.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's surreply is HEREBY ORDERED STRICKEN from the record. Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR Mfg., Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404-05 (9th Cir. 2010). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Scott v. Palmer

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 28, 2013
CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Scott v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. J. PALMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 28, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2013)