From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. McDonald

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 4, 2013
2:09-cv-00851-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2013)

Opinion

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California, MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711 Supervising Deputy Attorney General DAVID C. GOODWIN, State Bar No. 283322 Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Medina, Betti and Barron.


          [PROPOSED] ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Good cause appearing, Defendants request to take Plaintiff Howard Scott's (P-83633) deposition via videoconference is GRANTED. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff is housed to obtain video-conferencing equipment if it is not already available.


Summaries of

Scott v. McDonald

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jun 4, 2013
2:09-cv-00851-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Scott v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2013

Citations

2:09-cv-00851-MCE-EFB-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 4, 2013)