From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Crain

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division
May 18, 2010
Civil No. 10-CV-4021 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-CV-4021.

May 18, 2010


ORDER


Now on this 18th day of May, 2010, comes on for consideration the proposed findings and recommendations filed herein on April 8, 2010, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen days having passed without objections being filed by the parties, the court hereby adopts in toto the findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to return the completed IFP application or pay the filing fee. Plaintiff has not sought an extension of time to respond to the Court's order. Therefore, this action should be and is hereby dismissed based on Plaintiff's failure to comply with the orders of the Court and his failure to prosecute this case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Scott v. Crain

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division
May 18, 2010
Civil No. 10-CV-4021 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Scott v. Crain

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. SCOTT PLAINTIFF v. SHERIFF JERRY CRAIN, Hempstead County, JONNY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division

Date published: May 18, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-CV-4021 (D. Kan. May. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Southeastern Plumbing Supply v. Lee

The trial judge is required, without request, to charge upon the material and controlling issues in the case.…

Martin, Ginter Powers v. Liberty County Bd.

The defendant pleaded these checks as an estoppel against the plaintiffs but refers to them in its brief as…