From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scott v. Beth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 29, 2008
47 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2620.

January 29, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered September 26, 2007, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's first two causes of action for breach of an employment contract, with leave to renew following the completion of discovery, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the first two causes of action dismissed.

Kornstein Veisz Wexler Pollard, LLP, New York (Marvin Wexler of counsel), for appellants.

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison LLP, New York (Mark H. Alcott of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Acosta, JJ.


The record on appeal contains ample undisputed evidence supporting defendant Beth Israel Medical Center's determination that plaintiff breached the duty of good faith and loyalty he owed it ( see Maritime Fish Prods, v World-Wide Fish Prods., 100 AD2d 81, 87-88, appeal dismissed 63 NY2d 675), and demonstrating as a matter of law that its dissatisfaction with his conduct was genuine, affording it good cause to terminate his employment ( see Golden v Worldvision Enters., 133 AD2d 50, 51, lv denied 71 NY2d 804).

While an individual may seek another position before leaving his or her employment, he or she may not make use of the employer's time, facilities or proprietary secrets in preparation for engaging in a competing business or endeavor ( see Maritime Fish Prods., 100 AD2d at 88). Plaintiff not only began offering himself to Beth Israel's competitors while there were still years left on his contract, but also, in the process, offered the services of the entire orthopedics department, without even obtaining the permission of all the affected doctors, and used his position as chairman of the department to obtain various confidential documents containing contractual and financial information that Beth Israel did not provide to the public and that it disseminated internally on a need-to-know basis, and turned these documents over to Beth Israel's competitors ( see Bronx-Lebanon Hosp. Ctr. v Wiznia, 284 AD2d 265, 265-266, lv dismissed 97 NY2d 653; Gibbs v Breed, Abbott Morgan, 271 AD2d 180, 185-186).


Summaries of

Scott v. Beth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 29, 2008
47 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Scott v. Beth

Case Details

Full title:W. NORMAN SCOTT, Respondent, v. BETH ISRAEL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

47 A.D.3d 541 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 562
850 N.Y.S.2d 81

Citing Cases

Fewer v. GFI Group Inc.

Plaintiff is not entitled to summary judgment dismissing the fifth counterclaim, which alleges breach of…

Detorres v. Claxton-Hepburn Med

Defendant also cited the Medicaid regulation which provides for monetary sanctions against a provider where a…